Most galvanizing disputes are not about corrosion protection. They are about appearance, and about whether a mark on a member is a defect or a normal outcome of dipping steel in molten zinc. The three standards do not agree with each other, so the answer depends on which one your purchase order names.
The short version. Under EN ISO 1461, darker or lighter areas, a cellular pattern and some surface unevenness are explicitly not a cause for rejection. Under IS 4759, the coating must be free from “flux, ash, bare patches, black spots, pimples, lumpiness, runs, rust stains, bulky white deposits and blisters” — a stricter cosmetic list. ASTM A123 sits between them and is mainly concerned with thickness, adhesion and the size of anything uncoated.
So the same member can pass one specification and fail another on appearance alone, with identical corrosion performance. Decide which standard governs before the first consignment ships, not at the inspection. That single sentence prevents most of the arguments this page describes.
What each standard permits to be touched up, and how much.
| ASTM A123 | EN ISO 1461 | IS 4759 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size of a single uncoated area | May exceed 25 mm in only one of its two dimensions (§6.2.1) | Each area for renovation ≤ 10 cm² (§6.3) | No area limit stated (Annex A-6) |
| Total uncoated area per piece | ≤ 0.5% of the accessible surface area and ≤ 256 cm² per tonne of piece weight (§6.2.2) | ≤ 0.5% of the total surface area (§6.3) | Not stated |
| Repair thickness | Per ASTM A780: zinc-rich paint 50% thicker than the surrounding coating, max 100 µm; zinc solder to the specified thickness, max 100 µm; thermal spray to the A123 thickness for the category | Minimum 100 µm unless the purchaser states otherwise (§6.3) | Not stated |
| Permitted methods | ASTM A780 — zinc-rich paint, zinc-based solder, thermal spray | Zinc-rich paint or paste, low-melting-point zinc stick, zinc thermal spray | Zinc spraying, zinc-rich paint (normally min. 90% metallic zinc by mass in the dry film), or a low-melting-point zinc alloy |
| Appearance as grounds for rejection | Not a basis for rejection where thickness and adhesion pass | “Darker or lighter areas … or some surface unevenness shall not be a cause for rejection” | Stricter: a named list of cosmetic imperfections the coating must be free from (§6.2) |
⚠ One limit that catches people out. ASTM A123 applies its size limits at the galvanizing plant. Once the parts have left, A123 states there is no limit on the size of an area subject to renovation — damage in transit or at site is a different question from a bare spot that left the kettle. Do not let a site argument be settled with a plant clause.
What it looks like, why it happens, and whether it is a reject.
We galvanize on our own kettle at Howrah, so a defect argument is with us rather than with a sub-contractor we would have to chase on your behalf. We hold 75–85 microns, read on a calibrated DFT gauge and reported per batch, and we will send the readings with the consignment rather than on request.
Two things we will say plainly. Our laboratory is real but not NABL-accredited; where a specification requires NABL type-test reports, that testing is arranged with an accredited laboratory against the order. And our kettle is 7.0 metres, so members longer than that are double-dipped with the overlap line described above. Both are better known at enquiry than at inspection.
Answered from our own line, not from the standard's cover page.
Not under EN ISO 1461, which states that darker or lighter areas, a cellular pattern or some surface unevenness shall not be a cause for rejection. A dull grey coating is caused by the silicon and phosphorus content of the steel driving the zinc-iron alloy layer to the surface, and it is often thicker than a bright coating and protects at least as well. IS 4759 sets a stricter cosmetic list, so on an Indian specification a buyer may still raise it. If uniform appearance matters, control the steel chemistry at the mill before the order rather than argue about it after galvanizing.
Under ASTM A123 an uncoated area may exceed 25 mm in only one of its two dimensions, and the total uncoated area on a piece must not exceed half of one per cent of the accessible surface area, nor 256 square centimetres per tonne of piece weight. Under EN ISO 1461 each area for renovation must not exceed 10 square centimetres and the total must not exceed 0.5 per cent of the total surface area. IS 4759 permits renovation in Annex A-6 without stating an area limit. Beyond those limits the piece is re-galvanized rather than repaired.
EN ISO 1461 requires a minimum of 100 microns on renovated areas unless the purchaser states otherwise. ASTM A780, which ASTM A123 refers to, requires zinc-rich paint to be applied 50 per cent thicker than the surrounding coating up to a maximum of 100 microns, zinc-based solder to the specified thickness up to 100 microns, and thermal spray to the thickness A123 requires for that material category. IS 4759 names the permitted methods without stating a thickness. Agree the method and the thickness in writing, because a repair that satisfies one standard may not satisfy another.
No. Members longer than the kettle are dipped from one end and then the other, which is normal and accepted practice under IS 2629 and ASTM A123, and the overlap line is a consequence of it. Our kettle is 7.0 metres, so anything longer carries that line. If your specification prohibits a visible overlap on exposed faces, that is a real restriction on member length and it needs to be stated at enquiry, because it changes which suppliers can quote the job.
That is a commercial question decided by your contract, not by the coating standard, and it is worth settling before the first consignment. What the standards decide is whether the member is rejectable at all. Where the cause is a fabrication or design matter such as inadequate vent holes, locked-in stress or weld slag, the answer usually differs from a case where the cause is kettle housekeeping or immersion control.
Usually not. White rust is zinc oxide formed where moisture is trapped between closely stacked galvanized faces with no air movement, and it is normally cosmetic. It matters where it has consumed enough zinc to take the coating below the specified thickness, which is settled by measuring on a DFT gauge rather than by looking. It is prevented by spacing, ventilation and wrapping at packing.
Tell us the standard, the coating requirement and the component, and we will confirm in writing what we can hold and how we will certify it. Galvanizing is on our own floor, so the answer comes from us and not from a sub-contractor.
Request a quotation Galvanizing job work